but going back to this article, it says, as for barack obama, he did indeed ban immigration from iraq for much longer than trump's order bans it from the seven listed nations. and none of the people melting down today uttered a peep of protest. richard granell summed up it -- summed it up perfectly in a tweet. quote, obama took six months to review screening for one country. trump will take three months for seven countries. this article goes on, number five, trump's refugee caps are comparable to obama's pre-2016 practices. david french, who was touted as a spoiler candidate to keep donald trump out of the white house, during the presidential campaign, in other words, not a big trump fan, wrote a lengthy and clear-headed analysis of the executive order for national review. he noted that after the andtorium ends in 120 days, that's one section, it ends in 120 days, the other section is 90 days, another part says they'll have 30 days to produce a report, but it goes on to say, trump caps refugee admissions at 50,000 per year. which is roughly the same as president obama's admissions in

obama's executive orders on immigration. therefore they don't necessarily have the lasting impact he would like them to have. on this immigration order, news just coming in which is the first poll we have seen in which is the first poll we have seen since the order came into place last friday showing that 49% of americans agree with donald trump's immigration ban, a1% disagree so a lot of americans think this is a good idea. there aren't many moments to ta ke good idea. there aren't many moments to take a breath and consider what's going on, but let's take one of those right now. what have you been making the last ten days? unlike anything i've seen in us politics, if nothing else for the speed of which things are moving here, but there was this natty phrase that came up after the campaign which is that donald trump supporters took him seriously but not literally and journalists took him literally but not seriously. we have learned that both are relevant, take him seriously and literally because he is delivering on his campa

among the people on the senate that voted for hardiman include harry reid, barack obama and hillary clinton. sean spicer today said though, shep, either one of which of those people donald trump selects to be the nominee for the supreme court, they should get an easy confirmation in the senate. here is spicer again. >> they may not like the political background, but academia, background, time on the bench, the expert tease and criteria meets the intent of both republicans and democrats. >> all right. so where is the money ride something we're getting sources who are suggesting that gorsuch will be the pick. the caveat, nobody has actually confirmed it to us yet. i think white house officials are under threat of severe harmship should they disclose that information before 8:00 p.m. we'll leave it as a strong tilt towards gorsuch with the caveat that he could always pick hardiman. how about that for being confide confident? >> shepard: i can do that. very good, john roberts, thanks for clearing that up. the top democrat on senate judiciary committee says she will vote no on president trump's

let us not forget that former president barack obama promised that he would bankrupt the coal industry. people are losing their jobs and dignity that comes with work. our communities are also suffering. fewer jobs means less economic investment and less hope. i encourage my colleagues to visit west virginia or appalachia and see firsthand what president obama's policies have done to our communities. it is heart breaking to hear the stoyrrs -- stories and see the faces of struggling families as they try to pay their bills. i stand today with those communities in rolling back the policies that have caused so much harm and pain. these new regulations would be catastrophic to the coal industry and all of the hardworking american families that depend on coal to keep heir energy costs low. and the shame of it all is that it's preventable. we must end this war on coal now. and that process begins today. i made a promise to my constituents of the second district of west virginia that i would fight for the coal industry and bring back jobs to my state. today is the first of many steps this cong

. >> democratic lawmakers have -- theced legislation to inspired barack obama to wade back into politics for the first time since leaving the white house. a spokesman for the president says he fundamentally disagrees with discrimination targeting people based on religion. human rights lawyers and government officials also vowed to fight the travel restrictions of the executive order. we take a closer look at some of the lawsuits filed against donald trump and what might come next. >> cheered like rock stars after the american civil liberties union won their first legal battle against donald trump on the immigration ban. they were greeted like heroes. donors have raised over $20 million over the weekend. that is seven times more than their annual contributions in 2015. the civil liberties union says support his final -- is vital for the legal fight ahead. >> we are gearing up for a big battle. we have no illusions that the white house will not fight it hard, so i think it will be a protracted litigation battle. >> the aclu is not the only one suing the president. the council on islamic re

fallout from donald trump's travel ban continued on monday barack obama injecting himself into the debate and the acting attorney general refusing to defend the order in court. thep and a day 11 by firing obama administration holdover, serving as the department of justice chief, and installing a new acting attorney general. on theknow your thoughts latest twist over the president's executive order on extreme the thing. democrats call-in at (202) 748-8000. republicans call in at (202) 748-8001. independent colors call-in at (202) 748-8002. and a special line this morning for recent immigrants -- (202) 748-8003. you can always catch up with us on social media on twitter and on facebook. good tuesday morning to you. the country waking up to a new head of the department of justice today. dana been taken appointed by donald trump as the acting attorney general after sally gates ordered her staff to refuse to enforce the president's temporary ban on entry to the united states for citizens of the seven muslim majority countries. the washington post story said that the white house said that " yat

whereas barack obama blamed george w. bush for every problem. >> reaction. >> i think both points are right, look, we got we got former president also have sally yates i referred to two hot dogs you showed both of them in the footage you had. yates was acting attorney general, her own office of legal council had reviewed the order, and commented on it signed off on it. so if she disagreed with that, she should have resigned hers for her to direct the department of justice not to defend the order first of all, she was being a hot dog second of all, her office of legal council short think tank. >> i justice department one political apointe he is not there yet all career people signed off on this have some swth the other who hot dog cory booker wearing his little cap talking about how people are attacking muslim americans, please tell me, please, mr. booker senator booker give me the name of the person who is attacking the muslin-american give me name of the muslin-american citizen who itself being attacked by the individual

sally yates, appointed us attorney general by barack obama, said in a letter to lawyers at the justice department that given her responsibility to ensure that the government stands for what is right... deeming that an act of betrayal, mr trump promptly sacked her, installing dana boente as the new attorney general. pending the swearing in of mr trump's preferred candidate, alabama senator jeff sessions, whose confirmation has been delayed by democrats in congress. sally yates is not alone in her misgivings, though. barack obama said in a statement that he fundamentally disagreed with the notion of discriminating against individuals on the basis of faith or religion. us diplomats have also registered their concerns, leading to this tongue lashing from the white house. if these career bureaucrats have a problem with it, i think that they should either get with the programme, or they can go. later today, mr trump is due to announce his pick for a place on the us supreme court. the choice, he said, was one that would appeal to evangelical christians. he may also be hoping it leads to some

the seven countries came from the barack 0bama seven countries came from the barack obama administration, because in 2011 he issued a very similar executive order banning all iraqi nationals from any visas or entering the united states. that is where that came from. the reason those seven nations were targeted or identified is because they cannot provide any of the vetting information that we need, which a nswe rs information that we need, which answers the unspoken question, why not saudi arabia or pakistan. those countries are willing to provide information on their citizens or their nationals which make it very easy for us to be able to issue visas. as far as this acting attorney general, i would have fired her as well. it is completely constitutional, it is insubordination, and the example i would give is, if you disagree with what your boss asked you to do in any work situation and publicly came out against it, they would not have theirjob by the end of the day either. but she is a legal adviser, she was talking about legal advice. from his point of view, if you don't disagree, that

barack obama only ba rack obama only left barack obama only left office 12 days ago and he has a ready is taken out that american values are the sta ke out that american values are the stake and people in the uk are protesting. in the uk people on the

and it has been a day of damaging headlines, with barack obama breaking his silence afterjust ten days, to say that he doesn't approve of this travel ban, and various american diplomats around the world also expressing disquiet. david kaye is the un special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression. he is also clinical professor of law at the university of california. thank you very much indeed for your time. shall we start with the legal part. just explain to us what role the attorney general of the united states plays in helping the daily functioning of the government. well, the department ofjustice is led by the department ofjustice is led by the attorney general, and the department ofjustice, the attorney general, essentially represent the united states in all forms of litigation in us courts. and so for the attorney general to say that she would not defend the executive order was really quite something. it was quite a shock, i think, and basically said to the white house that the department would not... that the department ofjustice would not defend the executive order.” s

at the time barack obama was president of the ita states. of course today donald trump is in the white house and noises from the white house are very different. you think it makes sense for britain to be cutting its bonds and ties with the european union at and ties with the european union at a time when the united states is being led by a man who is avowedly and proudly nationalist in his economics and his politics? well, look, first of all we are not leaving europe, we are leaving the eu and we want to remain a good european neymar and from theresa may's visit to washington you can see even now have that influence can play out and the opportunity for our european friends, britain exercising leverage, and you heard her say not being naive about putin, and standing with britain behind our nato commitments, that is a good example, but britain wants an independent foreign policy and that means. . . independent foreign policy and that means... and to be an independent, self—governing democracy, that means independent from the eu but we will h

in the latest development, the acting attorney general, sally yates, who was originally appointed by barack obama, has told lawyers at the justice department not to defend mr trump's executive order on travel restrictions if it is challenged in court. canada's prime minister calls the shooting at a quebec city mosque a terrorist attack, as one of the suspects, alexandre bissonnette, is charged with six counts of murder. and this video is trending on bbc.com: the british actor peter capaldi is to step down from his role as doctor who. he took over as the 12th time lord in 2013. he will remain as the doctor until the end of the current series. that's all from me now. stay with bbc world news. now on bbc news, it is time for hardtalk. welcome to hardtalk from nato headquarters in brussels. i'm stephen sackur. the job of nato secretary general isn't an easy one, this alliance is supposed to worked by consensus. and achieving that consensus just got a whole lot harder for my guest today, jens stoltenberg, nato‘s chief. why? the united states, nato‘s dominant member, is now being led by presi

present barack obama rejected the pipeline and 2016 after an angry, seven-year debate. prez obama says the project would not lower gas prices or enhance. fuel produces more carbon than conventionally produced feel, partly because it takes more energy fuel to extra. here's the argument. and bottomless -- pro keystone forces argue -- president trump says making the process more simple for companies and everyone else who wants to business in the united states. at bloomberg.ore head to bloomberg.com. ♪ vonnie: this is bloomberg markets. david: many world leaders stress there is agreement with donald trump of the play over the weekend. canadian prime minister justin trudeau wrote to those fleeing persecution, canadians will welcome you regardless of your faith. diversity is our strength. now is lily. what is the latest on the terrorist attacks yesterday? >> the latest information is that six people were killed. are ine five, two people life or death condition. was an attack on a mosque. miles from montreal. told -- opened fire on the group. we have to arrest reported from

barack obama did this. stepping back, calming down, allowing cooler heads to prevail. it's not his style. >> it's only a matter of time. right now they're easy targets for donald trump. they've been targets for a while. once it becomes -- it's not hard to imagine him attacking congress, and congress becoming a new villain for him, and that's when things get complicated because he needs them to implement his agenda. >> he has been loyal to his base. you can't afford to lose ground getting elected at 46%. a lot of these republicans are talking about some of the public statements. privately for them and their aides, they're getting, remember, he ran around the whole campaign saying we were stupid. we didn't know how to do anything. not just democrats. the congress, republicans. they were the stupid people, and he knew how to get things done where. >> that's exactly right. this is a first test of the trump m. o. not just trump. it's specifically let's just sort of dig deeper here. miller, steven miller, who were basically the authors of this, and their whole point in this

president barack obama rejected ae keystone xl after seven-year debate. president obama said at the time the project wouldn't lower gas prices, nor would it enhance the nation's security. he also said it would undercut u.s. leadership on climate change. institute,o the -- and 8% to 30% more carbon than conventionally produced fuel. it takes more energy to extract then refine. the industry says increase is more like 6%. environmental group says the keystone xl will have dependency on oil for decades. pro forces are still being produced potentially by rails, which increase the risk of accidental spills. president trump since his keystone decision was much more simple for oil companies. for everyone else that wants to do business in the united states. you can read more about keystone and xl in the bloomberg business report. >> let's go to politics in france. a run-up of the socialist primary. about 58% of the votes. >> there are many reasons to be worried and the world around us is more unstable than ever. pressure vladimir putin is exerting on europe and in

the trump administration, though, still defending the order saying they're following barack obama's lead. we'll fact check that. and i'll talk live to an activist reacting to a hateful tweet and has turned it around and is using it to help refugees. >> and a mosque shooting in quebec, two suspects now under arrest. >>

barack obama and other senators have been in charge eight years. we inherited, this president in the early days of his administration is doing what every president's first job is to do, which is to keep our country, its interest, allies and people safe. >> kellyanne, it sounds like there's no chance that the administration would revisit this executive order. i ask you this because elon musk, ceo of tesla, founder of spacex tweeted please read immigration to twitter followiers, let me know amendments. we'll seek advisory council amendments and present to the president. should he not bother? >> i never said that nor would i say that. you're putting words in my mouth. elon musk was in the white house last week meeting with the president. >> will the president reconsider the order? >> the president will never reconsider things that will keep us safe. he knows things we don't and elon musks doesn't because he's president. everyone saying he doesn't take intelligence briefings seriously. yes, he does. with that insult and slight aside, he knows things we

in fact, barack obama did it and explained it. i think listening to rick talk about this makes you wonder just how badly the president's staff screwed this thing up and how only fools rush in. and they rushed in on this and it caused, sean spicer can underplay it as much as he wants, but it caused chaos across the globe. >> chaos and also risks alienating allies that the president needs at home in both parties. donald trump tweeted, two sentences. there is nothing nice about searching for terrorists before they can enter or country. this was a big part of my campaign. both of those things are true. but if you go about doing it in a way that alienates people than you have to with mentality in the white house amongst some official the more negative coverage they get the more it proves they are doing it right. i think rick did make a good case on the merits of certain aspects of what they did but i think as he also said and i believe with both parts of what he said. if you do things that you think are right and you think you have a m

that is one of the areas where macron has a potential like barack obama did. people project what they want to see onto this unknown candidate and then once the policies are introduced they can decide whether they liked it. francine: from queen mary university of london and trevor from royal london asset management, let's get straight to the bloomberg business flash. here's nejra cehic. to hiretarbucks plans 10,000 refugees over five years around the world after president trump immigration action. ceo howard schultz wrote that he had a heavy heart over trump's order and that the promise of the american dream is being called in to question. schultz wrote that starbucks is in contact with staff affected by the band and will do everything possible to help them navigate the confusion. toyota has lost its title as the top-selling carmaker in the world despite its main rival suffering the worst year in its history. sold 10 point 2 million vehicles worldwide in 2016 while volkswagen managed 10.3 million. they ended the four-year reign following the fallout from the di

not all of barack obama's choices were moderate nominees. there were some pretty liberal nominees there. i mean, he won. he's allowed to have people of his philosophical stripe. >> chris, let me tell you, there's a different world there. when i listened to your lead-in and mitch mcconnell said we just want to be treated the way we treated obama nominees, does he think we have amnesia? that he refused for the first time in the history of the senate to meet with or have a hearing or vote on a supreme court nominee? we're going to treat this nominee fairly, but we need to know who he or she is, what they stand for and believe that they're in the mainstream of thinking when it comes to american political thought. chris: senator durbin, thank you. please come back, sir. >> thanks a lot. chris: up next, we'll bring in our sunday group to discuss president trump's extreme vetting plan. and that phone call with russian president putin. ♪ ♪ >> the world is a mess. the world is as a angry as it gets. you think this is going to cause a little more

trump also stated his executive order is similar to the former president barack obama's policy of a ban on iraqi refugee visas. for six months in 2011, a point of factual difference here that is important to point out. while mr. obama's policy did impose new screening procedures, an outright ban, that was never, ever implemented. >> countries across the middle east and beyond are reacting to the ban. our ian lee joins us live from istanbul in turkey. ian, what is the reaction in turkey? >> cyril, we've really only heard from the deputy prime minister at this point, mehmet saying we would happy welcome global talent not allowed back into the united states. now this announcement by president trump came late on friday, which was already the weekend here, it being monday now, we're expecting possibly to get some official reaction from the government. but expect the turks to walk on a bit of eggshells really with their response. we have seen what president trump does with criticism, how he reacts. the turks hope to have better relations with president trump than they had with president obama

. >> and he also stated his executive order was similar to former president barack obama's policy, a ban on visas of 2011. mr. obama's policy did not -- did impose new screening procedures, however there was never an out right ban that was implemented. >> we are hearing reaction from mr. trump's chief of staff. >> reince priebus trying to assure the country green card holders will be allowed. >> what i am suggesting to you is that customs and border control, i suspect if they have a person that is traveling back and forth to libya or somalia or yemen, i would suspect within their discretion they might ask a few more questions at jfk or some other airport when somebody is coming back and forth within their discretionary authority as a customs and border patrol agent. >> there was a great deal of confusion in deciding how to decipher the order. >> again, reince priebus saying the executive order stands and is affective. the u.s. senate democratic leader is among those denouncing the order. >> chuck schumer vowed to get the president's order overturned. >> this executive order -- was me

those were all decisions taken under barack obama. but it has strong bipartisan support from both the republicans and the democrats. and they have promised to continue to follow up on, for instance, increased us presence in europe. i promised you we would talk specifics about some of donald trump's particular grievances with nato. one is very much about finance. he says "we are getting ripped off by every other country in nato". he says "unless countries front up and pay the required 2% of gdp on their military spending, the united states will consider walking away from the nato alliance". right now only five countries meet that 2% threshold, that means nato is in grave danger, doesn't it? well, what we have seen is that nato allies in europe have started to increase defence spending. how much is germany going to be spending in the next financial year on its military as a proportion of its gdp? it's 1.2, isn't it? 1.296. that's almost 50% below what donald trump says they have to spend, if he's not to consider walking out of nato. i a

on border security, barack obama did not build a wall or a big fence as trump has promised. but he did build the biggest system in the nation's system. criminal justice he captured the unprecedented title of deporter in chief. i have already admitted that i have no idea what trump is really capable of. if the charge tonight is to believe in the force, that force has to be one of communication and dialogue. a historically informed understanding of our shared responsibility for the nation we have built. this may sound quite quaint for those ready for massive civil disobedience. it is a democratic tradition right for expansion. in the context of the successful protest of the standing rock sioux tribe, he writes weighted writes waves of protests in the days after the election look less like spontaneous outrage and more like a preview of what the next four years may hold. descend on the capital today after the election. democracy may be under attack in the white house and congress, but it is likely to thrive in the streets. civil disobedience is not democracy at work, it is a for

not all of barack obama's choices were moderate nominees. there were some pretty liberal nominees there. i mean, he won. he's allowed to have people of his philosophical stripe. >> chris, let me tell you, there's a different world there. when i listened to your lead-in and mitch mcconnell said we just want to be treated the way we treated obama nominees, does he think we have amnesia? that he refused for the first time in the history of the senate to meet with or have a hearing or vote on a supreme court nominee? we're going to treat this nominee fairly, but we need to know who he or she is, what they stand for and believe that they're in the mainstream of thinking when it comes to american political thought. chris: senator durbin, thank you. please come back, sir. >> thanks a lot. chris: up next, we'll bring in our sunday group to discuss president trump's extreme vetting plan. and that phone call with russian president putin. ♪ ♪ i've been on my feel all day. i'm bushed! yea me too. excuse me...coming through! ride the gel wave of comf

i have resisted and people know barack obama was the worst president we ever had to get what he has done to this count country. i didn't vote for him and he's not my idehe isnot my idea of wt should do. but the country is okay. you look at the way that we live and they are very much there is to answer your question, i hope he will be able to look back and say there was something providential that one reason i might be inclined is it was so unexpected. did you think that he was going to win back me neither. my wife said i can't believe that he is president. he isn't dead but he will be. who knows what god has in mind. there have been more unlikely things that i've written about in the book that this could be a beneficial and hopeful time. one thing that is very good, we went through eight years which people didn't get everything they wanted but particularly during the first two years, people laughed at a lot of what they wanted in terms of financial reform with dodd frank and the lilly ledbetter act at all of these achievements in the reelection. we will see some things in the republican

every president does that to a certain -- howard: and you put that in the piece, barack obama and george bush looking at putin's soul. >> and you certainly could have gone back even further. but what was striking for me watching that press conference was how much when each of these very specific policy issues came up, donald trump repeatedly returned to the personal. you sort of got the sense when he was asked about putin that his russia policy would be largely dictated by if he and the president of russia sort of hit it off on a personal level. you know, when he was asked about britain's decision for the brexit vote to break from the european union, donald trump said it was a good idea, but the evidence he gave was that he had once, you know, in his former life as a real estate magnate done a deal there, and he had a lot of trouble getting permits with that group of nations, andt it was easier country to country. howard: you think he personalized it. >> yeah, he absolutely did. how're howard now, i happened to see you in the briefing room on friday evening after trump had signed those t

barack obama did it with iraqis for six months. jimmy carter did it with iranians during that hostage crisis. how is this different? >> well, i don't know the details of those orders but i can tell you this much. you have seven nations that are included with no criteria whatsoever. again, someone may already be a permanent resident of the united states and may have served in the military, according to the executive order, they can be detained and sent back for no reason, no clear, specific reason. on top of that, look at the point in this executive order on religion. this is -- should be chilling to anyone in america who cares about religious liberty. there is an exception made, a potential for the exception made for anyone who is not muslim. there are no exceptions allowed for someone who is muslim. that goes against our constitutional values as well. if the executive order said, here are a list of things that might be considered exceptions and we'll weigh those, great. but the only category where it allows for people to be consid

under barack obama, quite often we were not. the real question is whether under donald trump we will be willing to have the visible hand of the united states. charlie: who has the strategic mind to create a new world order? richard: i think there are ideas out there. i did my best to put one out in this book, basically a new operating system for the world. we have had an operating system in the world, a set of rules, for nearly four centuries, which was very basic. you don't use military force to change borders and you allow governments tremendous space to do what they want in their country. i call that world order 1.0. it is based on the idea of sovereignty. when i argue is that during the era of globalization, that is necessary but not sufficient. charlie: we now have all kinds of means to transmit, transform. richard: the conveyor belt of globalization. something breaks out -- suddenly, zika virus or worse can spread around the world. digital things can spread instantaneously. terrorists, hackers, climate change. none of thes

obama was in ,ffice, the republican party they sat on their hands and did not do anything. they did not help them to do anything. you have big businesses hiring illegal immigrants. they like it because they don't have to pay them a whole lot. and they are the one benefits. building the ball is senseless. you are wasting money. billions of dollars on building a fence that is not going to stop any immigrants. what you need to do is you just need to be getting these businesses that are hiring these people. if they're not being hired, they will not come over here. that is all i have to say. host: thank you. here are some tweets respond to it president trump said. this is from martha who said, donald trump, you are an embarrassment to our founding fathers and constitution. tom says, he is certainly consistent, i will give you that. most presidents do at least a couple of things are. megan said that i am encouraged with his patients and leadership. leadershipngible quality concerning obama. some folks responding, i could name many, but his policies are frivolous. let's go to new

it was to be expected that barack obama was going to be no different than all of his present investors. in fact, joe biden and chuck schumer opposed the nomination. in schumer's case, the approval of any supreme court nominee in the last year and a half and george w. bush is a term of office. biden, no approval in the last year. this is different. but where the democrats trying to obstruct? absolutely. is this going to be a better fight? absolutely. the end of the day it comes down to two things. one is, are there enough red state democrats to save the person who president trump is nominated is acceptable enough to the people in my state that i will pay a price if i turn into a blind obstructionist like they are already making me on the nominees to the cabinet look like. and second of all, if at the end of the day i was a sufficient number of them that they could keep in place, i think mitch mcconnell, he's absolutely right to say this is the senate's decision. my sense is if democrats harden the line and they get to 5859, 52 republicans and six or seven democrats, but not 28, they mig

that sounds a lot like barack obama eight years ago argued for stimulus. you have set up a budget coming soon, but the king of debt as trump called himself is on a collision course with fiscal conservatives. that's one of the things to watch, whether they aqiues to this. >> one group they mentioned were immigrants on special immigrant visas. these are the people that were translators in iraq for u.s. troops. they were being held up at the airport yesterday. they are -- these visas are vetted by every major intelligence agency. a lot of them have to take polygraphs. these are not people that anyone needs to worry about coming into this country. and a lot was made yesterday from the gentleman who came in as one of the translators who said he was a trump fran. that's not the point. these people shouldn't be treated like this and they could be in danger going back to where they are from. >> in trouble back home because of their help to the united states and their past. abby? >> some of my colleagues at "the washington post" reported on clues with talks about r

under barack obama, quite often we were not. the real question is whether under donald trump we will be willing to have the visible hand of the united states. charlie: who has the strategic mind to create a new world order? richard: i think there are ideas out there. i did my best to put one out in this book, basically a new operating system for the world. we have had an operating system in the world, a set of rules, for nearly four centuries, which was very basic. you don't use military force to change borders and you allow governments tremendous space to do what they want in their country. i call that world order 1.0. it i hims himbased on the idea ty.sovereign hi when i argue is that during the era of globalization, that is necessary but not sufficient. charlie: we now have all kinds of means to transmit, transform. richard: the conveyor belt of globalization. something breaks out -- suddenly, zika virus or worse can spread around the world. digital things can spread instantaneously. terrorists, hackers, climate change. none

my point in question here is that is one of the big criticisms that they head about barack obama which was that he ran through obama care with just democratic votes and here we are a few years later and it's falling apart. how do you come up with a replacement that is more durable and it seems to me that might be finding a way to bring along at least the democrats. how do you bring along at least some democrats it appears that donald trump has some consensus here. >> any replacement should be done in pieces. i believe there will be pieces of art reform agenda that some democrats could support. i would not want to replace obama care in one fell swoop. it be too easy for democrats to oppose it. maybe we should try to do this in pieces and put out aspects of this law and changes that the democrats would find hard to vote against. >> rather than a behemoth do this in pieces and maybe make it stronger. i want to get to another point. you come from a c in pennsylvania where they all said no chance donald trump could win. a big reason why he is the 45th president of the united states. on his

his predecessor, ba rack obama. view of vladimir putin and his predecessor, barack obama. the possibility of sanctions being lifted caused some alarm, even amongst members of donald trump's 1—party. the house speaker, paul ryan, cautioned against any such move, as did us senatorjohn mccain, who said that he would take legal action if sanctions were lifted against russia. on the subject of legal action, we're hearing that there are some writs that i know been filed against this executive order. people's wednesday being affected by travel bans. there are literally on the plane, the land and they are essentially illegal. how is there story developing? this executive order applies to so—called green card holders. these are people who are in the country legally, from these seven countries that were mentioned in order, but who are not citizens of the united states. if they happened to be out of the country when donald trump signed that order last night, they will clearly have difficulties getting backend, for the simple reason that there is this order, this 90 day stoppage o

and the president has the power of the pen for president barack obama's legacy. they look to rebuild their party, running for dnc chair and he's in houston for the dnc future forum. thank you for joining us. first and foremost, we played for our viewers at home, there are some people in miami really reacting there to the miami mayor's decision. i want to get your take on not only the sanctuary city executive order we see, but the extreme vetting of people into the u.s. >> thank you for having me. donald trump's executive orders have been disturbing, they go against fundamentally everything we believe in this country. we're a nation of immigrants. we as a country were formed because people were-- >> when you talk about disturbing, are you referring to the vetting of the refugees or the sanctuary city? or talking about both? >> i'm talking about both. you know, the country was founded because people were being persecuted because of their religion, so when you sign an executive order banning someone because of their religion, that's problematic. even dick cheney cam

you have donald trump denying that he had fewer people at his inauguration than barack obama did. and by the way, last sunday we had about three times as many people watching this particular program, "a.m. joy," then attended donald trump's inauguration, more than three times, actually. that is a numerical, statistical fact. no shade. why do people deny what they can see with their very eyes and what do you make of the rebellion of civil servants against trump? >> well, here is our problem. by "our" i mean all the citizens of the u.s. if you have an ideology, the research is pretty compelling, if you have an ideology, you see what you want to see. and there is a criteria now called science curious. and it's whether or not you're surprised by new information. and so we want to encourage people to surprise themselves, and we strongly believe that will change their outlook, their scientific view of facts. so this business of suppressing facts, i don't think it's sustainable. as you pointed out, there are so many people on twitter, social media will overwhelm us. but it is a remarkabl

with the barack obama relationship, they said that he was the greatest friend of israel ever. i think others have more valid claims to that. it is a mark of immaturity and a marked resource the conversation. he believes in tough love toward israel where bill clinton believed in love - love toward israel. when they feel supported, they are more willing to compromise. if you ask me how i feel, you can call me every ugly name in book. i go to my defensive crouch. if everyone doesn't talk about my legitimacy, i trust them, psychology 101. i want to end with three thoughts. to give a sense of? the complexity and depth. it is a three dimensional relationship. they are connected and bonded. the united states of america understand that we need each other. it is not some artificial relationship that emerges only because of powerful lobbyist. there is no lobby powerful enough in the world, not in the united states, to shape this kind of depth. to shape the kind of love that moynahan showed. you captain make up those values. you can't make up that .imensionality i will end with two diffe

it's pretty clear putin would rather be having this call with trump than barack obama. >> this is one place he's getting resistance within his own party though. >> that's exactly right. there's not a lot of places where they're butting heads. >> what about obamacare. we have reports in the post and the times that there's real fractious debate inside the republican party about what's going to happen if they repeal the law. >> i think the classic phrase is -- they always wanted to repeal obamacare. it's a great talking point. but now you have a lot of people who are very sick and need good coverage. how do you provide it for them while making it affordable to everyone el. it's not clear there's an easy answer. it's easy to say but they've had trouble figuring out what that answer might be. >> as we saw, the president had a face-to-face meeting with the british prime minister. what came out of that meeting? >> not a whole lot, which is good for president trump. the bar is very low when it comes to diplomatic interactions. the fact that there was not a blowup means it's as good as it coul

same concerns for barack obama gave him secure blackberry and run it through secret service. >> people really don't understand what's happening in the oval office when you walk. in ed henry might. he has been in there several times. we're talking about some major technology that the president walks into the white house with. including his old android galaxy phone. and a lot of people are noticing that he is tweeting from that phone, so you can trace back twitter, the source of where that comes from as sort of an every day person. you are saying wait a minute, why would that be a security concern? well, if the president today is in the oval office or moving around, especiallily leaving the white house with that phone, typically the kind of smart phones will carry today will give away your location, right? so that is not good if that gets into the enemy hands. be. ed: sends a tweet and marks where he is. is that what you are doing? >> no. you can just carry your phone and we can find you, trust me. but, here's the big gigantic humongous thing they are north telling you. ed: what's that?

department of homeland security under the former president barack obama. she told my colleague that she's never seen anything like this before. >> this is a order or series of executive orders by president trump that is using national security and the memory of 9/11 to justify sweeping refugee ban, immigration ban, country specific ban, that we've never seen proposed before, that we've never seen anything quite like it in the united states. it's a pretty historic moment and not in a good way for the united states today. >> did the vetting process for the immigrants or refugees deserve to be tightened in any way? >> i think any vetting or immigration process is constantly changing having served in the department of homeland security. you're constantly trying to make things better, make them tighter, more efficient as well. so there's no question that any of these programs could get better but the idea that you end it in the process of trying to reform it would never have crossed anyone's mind either in the bush administration or the obama administration. fo